Abra Holding Corp. v. Jackson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
In this action to foreclose a mortgage there are three motions before the court. One motion (the second one) is a motion by plaintiff to amend its complaint nunc pro tunc to include an allegation that plaintiff is a domestic corporation. Plaintiff claims that the complaint inadvertently omitted this allegation. Buie 93 of the Buies of Civil Practice provides that such an allegation must be included where the plaintiff is a corporation. However, an omission of this allegation is not ordinarily fatal to the pleading (Ochs v. Frey, 47 App. Div. 390), for such allegation is generally no part of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Fox v. . the Erie Preserving CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Adams v. Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
- Clark v. RowellNew York County Court, Delaware County · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alden Hotel Co. v. KaninNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Egrini v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1993