Legal Opinion

People v. Dally

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPebsonitjs, J.

The defendant avers that if the offenses alleged in the indictments were committed the persons whom he is informed appeared as witnesses before the grand jury were accomplices and that no corroborative testimony exists. In other words, the defendant avers that the indictments were found on the testimony of accomplices only, and that he desires the names of the witnesses for the purpose of making an application for the inspection of the grand jury minutes with the object of moving to dismiss the indictments on the ground that the only witnesses who appeared before the grand jury were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . GlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. People v. . SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. People v. SteinhardtNew York Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. MccannNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1938
  5. People v. Nicosia, New York County Courts1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Banks, New York County Courts1960
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. O'Keefe, New York County Courts1950
  4. People v. NaplesNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. Quinn, New York County Courts1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API