Legal Opinion

Finley v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 30, 1956No. Docket Nos. 43839, 43840Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Mtjlroney, Judge:

The principal issue is whether the Finley-Frazier partnership, consisting of Jerline Dick Finley and Gladys H. Frazier, is to be recognized for Federal income tax purposes. Materials, a corporation organized to engage in general construction work and to supply materials used in construction work, was controlled by petitioner and J. Floyd Frazier. In 1941 there took place a series of integrated steps which were, briefly, as follows: (1) Petitioner and J. Floyd Frazier transfer their stock in Materials to their wives; (2) Materials is liquidated and the assets,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. W. H. Armston Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Armston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Boyle, Flagg & Seaman, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  4. Harden M. Loan Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. Royce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API