Armstrong v. Medbury
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. (Sfcickney, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The defendant in this case is the owner of the PontiactGas works, fronting Wesson street.
The buildings of the works consist of a retort, purifying house, and a holder, and all stand facing the street, and *25119 feet from the line thereof. . They are 42 feet from the graveled or traveled portion of the street. There is no fence between it and the buildings. The other sides of the premises, except where they lie next to the railroad, are fenced.
The ground is level about the buildings. The center of the street and the railroad track are, however on a grade about three feet higher.
The holder is on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Early v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- Firfer Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Briney v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Shaw v. GoldmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Cole v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wallace v. Wilmington & N. R.Superior Court of Delaware · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.