Legal Opinion
Smith v. Continental Insurance Company
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 30, 1976No. 75-329PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
326 So.2d 189 (1976)
Harry SMITH, Jr., Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.
No. 75-329.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
January 30, 1976.
Rehearing Denied February 27, 1976.
Mulholland & Hapner and Gordon & Maney, Tampa, for appellant.
Michael N. Brown of Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for appellees.
SCHEB, Judge.
The trial court entered a summary final judgment in favor of the appellees/defendants, finding the appellant/plaintiff's cause of action based on negligence and implied warranty to be barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Miami v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Creviston v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Vilord v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Creviston v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. HolmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Bd. of Trustees v. Caudill Rowlett ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Keller v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Drake ex rel. Fletcher v. Island Community Church, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.