Bonneville v. Michigan Corrections Organization
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right a January 8,1989, order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant and dismissing plaintiffs’ fair-representation claim. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. The ten plaintiffs are all corrections officers at the Kinross Correctional Facility and are members of the bargaining unit represented by defendant. In March 1988, plaintiffs, as a class, filed a grievance with defendant, claiming that they were performing work at a higher classification than that for which they were being paid. The union appealed the claim through the third step of the grievance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Demings v. City of EcorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- O'Keefe v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Samuel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mollett v. City of TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re HarperMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Langlands v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Hanlon v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Michigan Supervisors Union OPEIU Local 512 v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.