Legal Opinion · Dissent

CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES, MONT. v. Moe

District Court, D. Montana

Decided February 4, 1975No. Civ. 2145Published

1DissentRussell E. Smith, District Judge

I agree that this court has jurisdiction and I agree, although for reasons different from those expressed in the per curiam opinion, that cigarette sales to non-Indians should be taxed.

*1318I dissent1 from so much of the per curiam opinion as denies the State the power to tax all cigarette sales on the Flathead Reservation.

I am aware that the decision in McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm’n, 411 U.S. 164, 93 S.Ct. 1257, 36 L.Ed.2d 129 (1973), and the dictum in Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145, 148, 93 S.Ct. 1267, 36 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973), cast grave doubt upon the position2 I take but,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API