Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 2000No. C031844PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

After their motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) was denied, defendants Robert Lawrence Russell and Louis Burks, Jr., pursuant to a plea bargain, pleaded guilty to transportation of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a); undesignated statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code). They were sentenced to prison and now appeal, contending the trial court erred in denying the suppression motion. We reject the contention and shall affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In April 1998, an information was filed charging defendants with (1)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. United States v. James A. McKinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. People v. McGaughranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. United States v. Francisco Hernandez-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. GallegosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. Delgado, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Arburn v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. United States v. AlvarezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  5. ARBURN v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API