Legal Opinion

FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. Chase

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1994No. 21757PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant, First National Bank in Albuquerque (“First National”), appeals from the district court’s order dismissing its action as barred under the statute of limitations set out in NMSA 1978, Section 55-2-725 (Repl.Pamp.1993). First National sought to collect the balance remaining on an automobile installment purchase agreement after the automobile had been repossessed and sold. The district court held that the four-year statute of limitations on contracts for the sale of goods governed First National’s claim. We affirm.

FACTS

On April 3,1986,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Associates Discount Corporation v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Worrel v. Farmers Bank of State of Del.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. Citizen's National Bank of Decatur v. FarmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. North Carolina National Bank v. HolshouserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. OuimetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Scott v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. D.A.N. Joint Venture, III v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Autovest v. AgostoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Badilla v. Wal-Mart Stores East Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API