Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Martin v. Simmons First Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 2007No. 07-93Published

1ConcurrenceAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice

I concur stice, express my disagreement with the majority’s reliance on the concept of domicile in determining which of two states is the proper forum for the probate of an estate. Specifically, the majority’s reliance on Phillips v. Sherrod Estate, 248 Ark. 605, 453 S.W.2d 60 (1970), is misplaced. In Phillips, we interpreted Texas statutes, which operate in terms of domicile. Id. Conversely, a review of Arkansas statutes reveals that a standard of residence applies in determinations of forum for the administration of estates. The probate statutes repeatedly refer to residence as opposed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Sherrod EstateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Shelton v. SheltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. McPherson v. McKay, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Smith v. RudolphSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Groschner v. WintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API