Frost v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The single question requiring ■consideration by this court relates to the personal liability of Mrs. Johnson and Miss Siegentlialer. It -arises by reason of the defense of the statute of limitations as set forth in Section 11221, General Code, which provides that an “action upon a specialty or an .agreement, contract or promise in writing shall be brought within fifteen years after the cause thereof •accrued.” Cleveland Trust Co. v. Elbrecht, 137 Ohio St., 358, 30 N. E. (2d), 433. Within the fifteen-year period payments were made by other assumers but not by Mrs. Johnson or Miss Siegentlialer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Regan v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Trustees of the Old Alms-House Farm v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Biddle v. PughNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
- Cottrell v. ShepherdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bender v. VaughanOhio Court of Appeals · 1958