Legal Opinion

Monforto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 2009No. 2D08-712PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Of a trial court’s many difficult duties, few are so delicate as instructing a deadlocked jury. Such instructions are potentially coercive, and the giving of them requires extreme sensitivity to the potential for impinging on a criminal defendant’s fundamental right to a trial by jury. In this case, Daniel Monforto contends that his convictions for robbery and burglary were tainted by fundamental error in the trial court’s instructions to a deadlocked jury. We agree and reverse.

After both parties rested in Monforto’s one-day trial, the trial court and the attorneys discussed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Gahley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. McKinney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MONFORTO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API