Monforto v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Of a trial court’s many difficult duties, few are so delicate as instructing a deadlocked jury. Such instructions are potentially coercive, and the giving of them requires extreme sensitivity to the potential for impinging on a criminal defendant’s fundamental right to a trial by jury. In this case, Daniel Monforto contends that his convictions for robbery and burglary were tainted by fundamental error in the trial court’s instructions to a deadlocked jury. We agree and reverse.
After both parties rested in Monforto’s one-day trial, the trial court and the attorneys discussed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Gahley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- McKinney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MONFORTO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010