Legal Opinion
E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 2, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2019-0657Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA E.M., : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No.: 19-657 (RC) v. : : Re Document No.: 170 SHADY GROVE REPRODUCTIVE : SCIENCE CENTER P.C.,1 : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff E.M. brought this action against her longtime fertility center, Shady Grove Fertility (“SGF”), after she was dismissed as a patient in early 2019. In October 2025, the Court held a two-week jury trial in this case. The jury returned a complete verdict for SGF, including on E.M.’s claims for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Singletary v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Carl McNeal v. Hi-Lo Powered Scaffolding, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Nyman v. Chairman, Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.