Legal Opinion

United States v. Sidney Bernstein and George Harr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 1969No. 195, Docket 33785PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, co-owners of Harr & Bernstein, Inc., were convicted on trial to the jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lloyd F. MacMahon, Judge, of causing to be made tax returns on behalf of Harr & Bernstein, Inc. understating its income for the years ending January 31, 1962, 1963, 1964 and 1965, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) and of evading personal income taxes during the years 1961 through 1965, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. We affirm the judgment.

The appellants, as co-owners of Harr & Bernstein, Inc. (the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Larry KnohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Joseph Armone, Stephen Grammauta, Vincent Pacelli, and Nicholas ViscardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. DilliardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. John Tortora, United States of America v. Samuel SantoroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Jerry A. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. James Allen HiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Donald Ferrarini, Everett J. Vieira, A. Michael Kagan, Bruno Rumnigant, Howard MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API