Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Flink v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 11, 1984No. 6962, 7060Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSingleton, Judge

PACTS

During the spring of 1981, Flink befriended a group of boys living near him. The boys included thirteen-year-old A.T., nine-year-old M.H., eleven-year-old W.G., and nine-year-old C.A. The boys would visit Flink frequently to play with his farm animals and to play pinball and foosball. Alcohol and drugs were apparently readily available to the boys at Flink’s house. Flink, a homosexual, admitted talking to the boys about many subjects, including sex.

The charges in the indictment arose from a series of events occurring in May and June of 1981. The state alleged that on three occasions…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API