Legal Opinion

Vincent Farrell, Jr. And Clotilde Farrell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 4, 1998No. 428, Docket 96-4197PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARTERTON, District Judge:

The facts of this case present the question of when and how the unique provisions of Rule 91 of the Tax Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure interplay with Rule 41 of the same, 26 U.S.C. foil. § 7453. The dispute in this case centers on the Tax Court’s'grant of leave to amend the Commissioner’s answer to the taxpayers’ petition for redetermination of a tax deficiency. The taxpayers in this ease, Clotilde Farrell and Vincent Farrell, Jr. (“the Farrells”), maintain that the Tax Court abused its discretion in so granting the leave to amend, arguing that the amendment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Branerton Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Clapp v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Warner M. Larsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. LeFever v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Saigh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Donald Merino Rosemarie Merino v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, DefendentsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Shami v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Shah v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. PlayMedia Systems, Inc. v. America Online, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API