Legal Opinion

Zahrte v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 22, 1980No. CV-78-19-BuPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

WILLIAM D. MURRAY, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION.

This is a strict liability action brought against Sturm Ruger & Company, Inc., a manufacturer of firearms. Trial of the action consumed three weeks. The jury, answering questions on a special verdict form, found that the plaintiff assumed the risk of his injury. Plaintiff now moves for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, raising three specifications of error. The issues were thoroughly briefed and argued, and carefully considered by the court. A review of those issues makes it clear that plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Day v. General Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Zahrte v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Trust Corp. of Mont. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Montana · 1981
  5. Smith v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API