Legal Opinion

Gevas v. Fernandez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2002No. 3D02-2048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHEVIN, Judge.

The Gevases seek a writ of certiorari. We grant the petition as the order denying the motion to compel respondent’s deposition and discovery of documents departs from the essential requirements of law from which there is no adequate remedy on appeal. Medero v. Florida Power & Light Co., 658 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Beekie v. Morgan, 751 So.2d 694 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

In this case, despite the court’s statement that it would readdress the discovery matters if the case was not tried as scheduled, and Fernandez’s counsel’s representation that the requested discovery would be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beekie v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Medero v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Lifemark Hospitals of Florida, Inc. v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API