Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Doxtater v. Murphy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1946PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRRY, C. J.
From the petition in this and in other cases it is apparent that counsel are not fully informed as to procedure and particularly pleading in cases involving denial of due process of law by failure to provide counsel. In some cases, as for instance those relating to the custody of minors, those relating to alleged fugitives from justice, and others, the procedure has been to issue a writ and then proceed as provided in sec. 292.19, Stats.
Sec. 292.03, Stats., provides that every application for a writ on behalf of persons sentenced to the state prison—
“must be made to the supreme court or to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goto v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Circuit CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Miller v. BolesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Dowe v. Circuit Court for Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Van Voorhis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Haas v. McReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.