Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grzankowski v. Southgate Plaza, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999Published

1Dissent

Pigott, Jr.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. In my view, Southgate Plaza, Inc. (defendant) met its burden of establishing its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law, and plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, I would affirm.

On March 12, 1992, at about 4:15 p.m., Susan M. Grzankowski (plaintiff) sustained injuries in a fall in the parking lot of Southgate Plaza, a shopping center located in West Seneca that is owned and operated by defendant. Defendant moved for summary judgment, contending that at the time of plaintiff’s fall the western New York…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuks v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Wall v. Village of MineolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Williams v. Geneva B. Scruggs Community Health Care Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Dunn v. 726 Main & Pine, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Ruck v. ISS International Service System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API