Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 26, 1947No. 15992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, J.:

The complaint in this action reads as follows:

“1. That plaintiff is informed and believes that the defendant is a railroad corporation created and existing under the laws of South Carolina, having and maintaining a railroad right-of-way between Allendale and Appleton in the above-named county, extending outward one hundred feet on each side of the center of its track, its rights in said right-of-way being limited to railroad purposes.
“2. That defendant’s track runs approximately east to west from Allendale to Appleton, and the defendant does now and for many years heretofore has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Thompson v. RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. Felder v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Byerly Ex Rel. Estate of Byerly v. ConnorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Miller v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Miller v. City of CamdenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Daniel v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Benjamin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API