Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1933No. 15903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, death.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed Zelma Arnold by striking her with a rock.

Deceased was appellant’s wife. Appellant had been away from deceased about two years. During his absence Roy High-tower lived in the same house with deceased. Upon his return, appellant and deceased took up their residence together. According to the version of appellant’s witnesses, deceased and appellant lived together as man and wife. The state’s testimony tended to show that appellant and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Hanks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API