Legal Opinion

Daryl Moody v. Hill, Kertsher & Wharton, LLP

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 30, 2018No. A18A1011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion for protective order filed by the plaintiffs in a legal malpractice action. We reverse.

*791 The appellants (Daryl Moody and three business entities associated with him: Mast Nine, Inc., UAS Investments, LLC, and Leucadia Investment Holdings, Inc.) commenced this action against the appellees (Hill, Kertscher & Wharton, LLP, Douglas Kertscher, and Robert Joseph), complaining that they were sued as a result of legal advice and services provided by the appellees. According to the complaint, in January and February 2015, Moody…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waldrip v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Christenbury v. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON LLP v. MOODYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  2. Daryl Moody v. Hill, Kertsher & Wharton, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API