Henley v. State

Doyle, Presiding Judge.

In this discretionary appeal, Joel Henley challenges an order revoking his probation based on new offenses. Henley contends that *777(1) the State failed to provide sufficient admissible evidence that he possessed (a) controlled substances or (b) drug-related objects, and (2) the trial court erroneously revoked more than two years of probation pursuant to OCGA § 42-8-34.1 (c). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for resentencing.

A court may revoke probation based on new violations if the evidence produced at the revocation hearing…