Legal Opinion
State v. Eighth Judicial District Court
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1984No. 13406Published
1Opinion of the Court
677 P.2d 1044 (1984)
The STATE of Nevada, Petitioner,
v.
The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada In and For the COUNTY OF CLARK, the Hoonorable Joseph S. Pavilkowski, District Judge, Department No. III, and Seymore Husney, Respondents.
No. 13406.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
February 6, 1984.
D. Brian McKay, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Robert J. Miller, Dist. Atty., Las Vegas, for petitioner.
Wright, Shinehouse & Stewart, Reid & Alverson, Las Vegas, for respondents.
OPINION
DAVID ZENOFF, Senior Justice.[1]
In this action, the State of Nevada seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the district…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. BurkhartTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Gary MalcolmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.