Legal Opinion

Ratner v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union of America

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 17, 1965No. Nos. 19135, 19153PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge:

These parties were previously before the court in Bakery and Confectionery Workers Internat’l U. v. Ratner1 when it was contended that the International and its members might not lawfully be subjected to payment of counsel fees to *505Attorney Ratner. It was argued then that the International and its membership had obtained no monetary “recovery” from which an allotment of counsel fees might be made pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 501(b).2 The International also submitted that no valid award could run against it without notice to its membership respecting fees. We rejected such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  2. Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Mozart G. RatnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Johnson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Moschetta v. CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mozart G. Ratner v. Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America, Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Mozart G. RatnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API