In Re Last Will and Testament of Smoak
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentGregory, Justice
I dissent. The sole issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to submit the question of undue influence to the jury. I would hold the evidence sufficient and affirm the jury’s verdict.
In a will contest, the contestants clearly have the burden of proof as to any alleged invalidity once due execution of the challenged will is proved. Byrd v. Byrd, 279 S. C. 425, 308 S. E. (2d) 788 (1983); Calhoun v. Calhoun, 277 S. C. 527, 290 S. E. (2d) 415 (1982). Although circumstantial evidence may be used to prove undue influence, such evidence must “... point unmistakably and convincingly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byrd v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Havird v. SchissellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Collins v. Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947