Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 2, 1925No. 27044PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
The defendant was con-
victed and sentenced for violating section 1 of Act 134 of 1890, p. 175 (as to which see the per curiam on the application for rehearing in State v. Savant, 115 La. 226, 229, 38 So. 974, 975).
His appeal presents three bills of exception.
Bills Nos. 1 and 2.
The statute is entitled, “An act making the abduction of women a crime;” and, so far as pertinent here, provides as follows;
“Section 1. That any person who shall fraudulently, deceitfully or by any false representation, entice, abduct, induce, decoy, hire, engage, employ or take any woman of previous chaste character…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henderson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. SavantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- People Ex Rel. Howey v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BourgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Brent v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948