Kay Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts :
As I see it, the majority ignores the holding and approach of the one case exactly on point, Berks County Tuberculosis Society Appeal, 418 Pa. 112, 208 A.2d 857 (1965),1 and proceeds apace to apply cy pres in a manner in -which it was never intended to be used. I would affirm the decree of the orphans’ court on the basis of its construction, with the help of extrinsic evidence, of testatrix’ will. I dissent.
Here, testatrix directed by her will that a single eleemosynary institution serving the blind receive a charitable bequest. The Western…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pusey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Commonwealth v. Erie Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Women's Homoeopathic Hospital of Philadelphia CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Abrams WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Pruner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.