Arendt v. Mace
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Ejectment. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
The action was brought to recover possession of lot 14 in block A, Pleasanton.
The plaintiff claims under a sale by the sheriff by authority of an execution issued upon a judgment recovered against John M. Mace, one of the defendants herein, and on a deed executed by the sheriff thereon.
The defense interposed was, that at the time of the levy and sale by the sheriff lot 14 was the homestead of-defendants, who were then husband and wife.
The court found against this defense, and defendants here contend that the evidence is insufficient to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Vincenzini v. FiorentiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Watterson v. E. L. Bonner Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1897
- Davis v. LockwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Furman v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- In re TognettiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.