Legal Opinion

In Re Wheat Farmers Antitrust Class Action

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 21, 1977No. Misc. No. 77-0060. MDL No. 129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

440 F.Supp. 1022 (1977)

In re WHEAT FARMERS ANTITRUST CLASS ACTION.

Joe ZINSER et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Clarence PALMBY and Continental Grain Company, Defendants.

John SPEARMAN et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Clarence PAMLBY and Continental Grain Company, Defendants.

Edgar W. CLEVELAND et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Clarence PALMBY et al., Defendants.

Misc. No. 77-0060. MDL No. 129.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 21, 1977.

Alan S. Mark and Jonathan R. Mook, Lobel, Novins & Lamont, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs-movants.

David J. Anderson and Lewis K. Wise, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Zinser v. PalmbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Byrnes v. Jetnet Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
  4. Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Zinser v. Continental Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API