Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Mid States Screw & Bolt Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 1984No. 83-8080PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNNE, District Judge:

This appeal concerns remedies under the Georgia Bulk Sales Act available to a creditor claiming improprieties in a bulk transfer of assets by both the transferee and the transferor. Also at stake, on cross-appeal, is the transferee’s right to indemnity for its payment of the transferor’s debt to the creditor.

We affirm, on alternative grounds, the lower court’s decision to dismiss the appellant’s fraud claim. Fraud allegations, based solely upon the Bulk Sales Act, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. As to the cross-appeal, we concur with the court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. American Express Co., S. A. I. v. Bomar Shoe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Indon Industries, Inc. v. Charles S. Martin Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, SAI v. Bomar Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Boss v. Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miguel A. Figueroa-Rodriguez v. Jorge L. Aquino, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Commonwealth Petroleum Co. v. Fulton (In re Fulton)District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
  3. Gilbert R. Johnson v. Mid States Screw & Bolt Company, Speizman Industries, Inc., Defendants- Vincent Brass & Aluminum Co., Cross Claim v. Mid States Screw & Bolt Company, Speizman Industries, Inc., Cross Claim DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Miguel A. Figueroa-Rodriguez v. Jorge L. Aquino, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API