Legal Opinion
United States v. Woods
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided July 21, 2010No. CR 109-127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 1 Therefore, the pri- or motions to dismiss the indictment are NULLITIES (doc. nos. 44, 56), and Defen dant’s supplemental motion to dismiss is DENIED (doc. no. 82).
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
W. LEON BARFIELD, United States Magistrate Judge.
The government has charged Defendant,…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Small v. Bud-K Worldwide, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. SchaffDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2011
- William Cartwright v. Amber L. PhillipsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026