Legal Opinion

Pace v. Still

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 10, 1931No. 13113PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendant Ethel Still to1 the plaintiff J. E. Pace, dated April 9, 1928, to secure the payment of a note of Ethel Still and' her husband, R. B. Still, to J. L. Pace, dated April 9, 1928, payable April 9, 1929, for $4,000, with interest from date at 8 per cent, per annum, payable semiannually, and attorney’s fees. The mortgage covered two tracts of land, aggregating about 10 acres, in the suburbs of the City of Greenville.

The circumstances leading up to the execution of this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ross v. DugganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  2. Carter v. Tanners Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Johns v. ReardonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  4. Alston v. MunfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1814
  5. Stevens v. ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pace v. StillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API