Legal Opinion

Fountain v. Mitros

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1998No. 97-126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Douglas Wayne Fountain (Father) appeals the district court’s final order of child support payments to Eleanore Mit- ros (Mother) for the support of their daughter. Father claims the district court abused its discretion in calculating his annual income and in failing to apply the “shared physical custody” provision. W.S. 20-6-304(d) (1997). Finding sufficient evidence was presented to support the district court’s decision, we affirm.

ISSUES

Father presents three issues for review:

I. Did the trial court erroneously calculate both parents’ net incomes and thereby…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cranston v. CranstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Basolo v. BasoloWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mintle v. MintleWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ready v. ReadyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Brandon Lee Jensen v. Margaret E. Milatzo-JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jordan v. BrackinWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Watson v. WatsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth BaileyWyoming Supreme Court · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API