Legal Opinion

Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick & Cabot v. Pennsylvania Insurance Department

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDERMOTT, Justice.

These are consolidated appeals of Commonwealth Court orders disposing of numerous preliminary objections raised by appellees in opposition to petitions for review filed by *142appellants.1 Appellants are coal haulers,2 who, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act,3 are required to purchase black lung disease insurance for protection of their employees. This coverage was mandated by a 1973 federal statute.4 The initial rates of premiums for this insurance were set by the Coal Mine Compensation Rating Bureau (“Bureau”), which is authorized by the Insurance Company Law of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. DuBree v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Gibson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Calabrese v. Collier Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Melmark, Inc. v. Schutt by and Through SchuttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. In Re Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Fitzgerald v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. PECHNER, DORFMAN, ETC. v. Pa. Ins. Dept.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. In re LeopardiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API