Legal Opinion

Poore v. Slaughter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 16, 1968No. 4612Published

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant, Robert H. Poore, appeals from a decree directing specific performance of an oral contract for the conveyance of timber. The trial court held that the payment of the consideration and the partial performance by appellees, Floyd Slaughter and Larry Don Slaughter,' d/b/a Slaughter & Son, was sufficient to take the oral contract out of the statute of frauds, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 38-101 (Repl. 1962).

For:-reversal,’ Poore-contends, that the; testimony was insufficient to establish an oral contract and that there was no part performance. Since we find that the record is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudspeth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Harrison v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API