Rogers v. Pennick
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
The parties have each moved for summary judgment. We will examine the motions under the well established standard. See Peters Township School District v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., 833 F.2d 32 (3d Cir.1987). Plaintiffs, Wayne Rogers and John B. Simmons, have challenged the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Pennsylvania Liquor Code. See 47 P.S. § 1-101 et seq. (Purdon 1969). The Code, generally proscribing the private, retail sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption, was recently reenacted with some…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Continental Vintners v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988