Legal Opinion
Cowgill v. Cowgill
Highland County Court of Common Pleas
Decided May 17, 1960No. 18712PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HOTTLE, J.
Trial of the within case having been had with both parties and their counsel present, upon the evidence adduced the Court refuses the relief prayed for in plaintiff’s petition.
The defendant has filed his answer and contends that the only way he can possibly expect a reconciliation of the parties is for the marriage relation to be sustained. The Court has expressed to the parties, in the presence of their counsel, its impression that this may not be the proper course. However, the Court is guided by the law which can be properly stated by quoting 17 O. Jur. 2nd, Section 34,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norris v. NorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- Ainsworth v. AinsworthOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Slyh v. SlyhOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Sandrene v. SandreneOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Cable v. CableLawrence County Common Pleas Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holderle v. HolderleOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- Cowgill v. CowgillOhio Court of Appeals · 1960