Legal Opinion
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 31, 1984No. Nos. 84-5060, 84-5068PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order conditionally certifying a class and directing notice to potential class members in an age discrimination suit brought against appellant, Xerox Corporation. Xerox argues that the order conditionally certifying the class is appealable under the collateral order doctrine announced in Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). We disagree, and dismiss the appeal on the ground that we have no appellate jurisdiction at this time.
I
Jules Lusardi and three other plaintiffs filed this class…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Eavenson, Auchmuty & Greenwald v. HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.