Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Creech

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 31, 1994No. 2109Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGoolsby, Judge

I agree with the majority’s decision that Creech was entitled to neither a mistrial nor to a directed verdict and therefore concur in Parts I and II of the majority’s opinion. Unlike the majority, however, I would hold the trial court did not commit any error, certainly not any prejudicial error, in not conducting a suppression hearing.

The facts in this case bear strong resemblance to the facts found in United States v. Peoples, 748 F. (2d) 934 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1067, 105 S.Ct. 2143, 85 L.Ed. (2d) 500 (1985). There, a police officer walked into the room in which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API