Legal Opinion

Carter v. Cryer

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 19, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion to dismiss bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Magie, Chancellor.

Complainant’s bill in this cause states the facts on which he relies for relief as follows: He is the owner of a lot of land in the city of Burlington, on which are buildings which were erected by a corporation of this state called the Sanitary Enameled Clay Company. In 1901 John A. Qualey obtained from that company, then in possession and presumably owner of the property, a contract for its sale and purchase by him, under which Qualey went into possession, and during the pendency of the contract placed thereon a one-hundred-and-fifty-horsepower air compressor for the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. General Electric Credit Corporation v. T. R. Grubbs, D/B/A T. R. Grubbs Tire & ApplianceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Commonwealth Quarry Co. v. GoughertyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Mandon v. RuggNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API