Legal Opinion
West Valley Land Co. v. Nob Hill Water Ass'n
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1986No. 52334-7PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
West Valley Land Company, Inc., is a real estate developer. It seeks recovery of all charges for water service for the past 2 years on the theory that Nob Hill Water Association, f/k/a Nob Hill Water Company, is a public water service company. West Valley also seeks a judgment declaring that Nob Hill is a water company subject to public regulation by the State Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) and attorney's fees together with treble damages under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. The purpose of Nob Hill is to construct and operate a water supply system to provide water to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Port of Seattle v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- El Vadito De Los Cerrillos Water Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Silver Firs Town Homes, Inc. v. Silver Lake Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2005
- El Vadito De Los Cerrillos Water Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Five Corners Family Farmers v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.