O'Connor v. Felix
New York Supreme Court
Appeal'from special term, New York county. Action by Thomas H. O’Connor against Peter W. Felix and others to foreclose a mortgage. From an order confirming the referee’s report, and directing the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, one Michael H. Hagerty, to complete his purchase, said purchaser appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The appellant, a purchaser at a foreclosure sale, insists that the order requiring him to complete his purchase should not have been granted, because the title tendered is not marketable. The judgment under which the sale was had was rendered in a suit to foreclose a mortgage of $25,000, made by the defendants Peter W. Felix and wife to the plaintiff, covering 18 lots of land in the city of New York. February 10, 1893, judgment of foreclosure and sale was granted and entered on'the usual affidavits, showing that all of the defendants had either been served or had appeared. At the sale had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Washbon v. . CopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bolton v. . SchrieverNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Craig v. . Town of AndesNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dutton v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hope v. ShevillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Stuyvesant v. WeilNew York Supreme Court · 1899