Legal Opinion

Dorothy J. Soderholm and Beverly A. Soderholm v. Duane L. Nauman and Martha Ann Nauman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 2015No. WD77626PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynthia L. Martin, Judge

Dorothy J. Soderholm and Beverly A. Soderholm (the “Soderholms”) appeal a trial court judgment which concluded that Duane L. Nauman and Martha Ann Nau-man (the “Naumans”) acquired .6 acres of the Soderholms’ property through adverse possession. The Soderholms assert that the trial court erred by (1) failing-to consider their motion to reopen the evidence following remand from an earlier appeal; (2) refusing to permit admission of official aerial photos into evidence; (3) determining a boundary location for the adversely possessed tract without a further eviden-tiary hearing; (4) concluding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lay v. P & G Health Care, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Underwood v. HashMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Murphy v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Bateman v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deanna L. Daniels-Kerr v. Monte G. CrosbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. St. Louis County, Missouri v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Ely v. AlterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Cornerstone Mortgage Inc. v. Kurt Ponzar and Sandra PonzarMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. EMERALD POINTE, LLC. v. TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, TANEY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API