In re Kendrick

Respondent, Walter V. Kendrick, was formally charged with failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; failing to keep a client reasonably informed; failing to keep his Ghent’s funds in a separate trust account; faffing to reasonably protect a Ghent’s interest upon termination of representation; and commingling and converting chent funds in violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4,1.15,1.16(d), and 8.4(a)(b) & (c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The facts developed at the hearing indicated that respondent failed to refund $200 to a chent which was to be used for…