Legal Opinion

Bozarth v. Landers

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Wayne county; the Hon. Chauncey S. Conger, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The position taken by counsel for complainants, that this appeal ought to be dismissed because this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine it, is not tenable. Dobbins v. Cruger, 106 Ill. 383.

This is the usual bill to foreclose a mortgage, and sets forth that Martin E. Bozarth, being indebted to complainants, made his mortgage on the lands involved, his wife, Mary Bozarth, joining with him in its execution, to secure such indebtedness. Among other covenants contained in the mortgage, it appears the mortgagor, Martin E. Bozarth, covenanted, for himself and his heirs, to pay all taxes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gage v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Dobbins v. CrugerIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Atlanta National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Rheinberger v. Security Life Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Piot v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Davis v. HamiltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. GallowayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API