Legal Opinion

Chilivis v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1975No. 29966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ingram, Justice.

Code Ann. § 92-3403a C (2) (v) provides that, ". . . equipment used exclusively in harvesting... crops...,” is not subject to the Georgia Sales and Use Tax Act, as amended, under the conditions provided in the statute. The Court of Appeals, in Blackmon v. Dixon, 134 Ga. App. 184 (213 SE2d 513), held that portable tobacco barns purchased by the appellee were exempt from the sales tax because they were used in curing tobacco and curing is an essential part of the harvesting process. We granted certiorari and reverse.

The revenue commissioner and the taxpayer come armed with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cherokee Brick & Tile Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. McNulty v. DeanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gold Kist, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Blackmon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nimmer v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Smith v. Dixon Ford Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Blackmon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Graham v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Hart County Board of Tax Assessors v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API