Hurt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of Lampassas. Tried below before the Hon. M. M. White. Appeal from a conviction of unlawfully carrying a pistol; penalty, a fine of $100. The judge’s qualification to defendant’s bill of exceptions showed that by mistake of the court no jury commissioners were selected to draw a jury for the term of the court at which defendant was tried.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying on and about his person a pistol. The statement of facts, as contained in the record, is not approved by the trial judge and, therefore, cannot he considered. The only question, independent of the statement of facts, is found in a bill of exceptions reserved to a refusal of the court to sustain a challenge to the array of jurors. The bill of exceptions shows, as qualified by the judge, that at the previous term of the court, through an oversight and neglect on the part of the court, the commissioners failed to select a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Columbo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Halbadier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Schuh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.