Legal Opinion

Casentini v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1994No. 25122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This petition involves the efforts of judgment creditor Cho Hunton, real party in interest, to satisfy her judgment against William Casentini. Hunton filed a complaint alleging that William has been transferring his personal assets and earnings to R&A Inc., a Nevada corporation (R&A), and his shares of R&A stock to petitioner Ansel Casentini, his father, in an effort to fraudulently avoid payment of the judgment. The complaint names William, R&A, and Ansel as defendants. Ansel insists that the Nevada district court has acted without jurisdiction, and petitions this court for a writ of…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barsam v. Pure Tech International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. Estate of William George Dyer v. Dist. Ct. (Guernier)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  3. GRUPO FAMSA, S.A. DE C v. VS. DIST. CT. (B.E. UNO, LLC)Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  4. GRUPO FAMSA, S.A. DE C v. VS. DIST. CT. (B.E. UNO, LLC)Nevada Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API